Articles · Retired or retiring soon

The enrollment window opens October 15. It cannot move one dollar of her premium.

What the October window actually changes, what prices the surcharge instead, and the one form that reaches backward. Every date and figure verified at...

James Ustby, CFP®
Written and reviewed by James Ustby, CFP®, APMA®Wealth Advisor, LPL Financial. Durham and Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Published October 2, 2026 · 11 minute read

This article first appeared in The Nest Egg, my daily email, on 2026-10-02. Read the original issue. It is educational, not a recommendation for you. The household in it is a hypothetical example, and market figures are as of the date shown and will have changed.

Every figure below names its document. Every calculation is shown. Nothing here is a forecast.

Good morning. Crude jumped 3.02% to $93.15 while the long bond eased to 5.605%, and every index finished green by a little. Then the window that opens in thirteen days, and the reason it cannot help her.

In today's issue

The tape. Oil up three percent, yields down at both ends, and a quiet finish. Two minutes.

October 15 to December 7. The three things that window actually changes, read out of medicare.gov word for word. Three minutes.

$1,148.40 and $2,884.80. Two surcharges, two different years, two different causes, and neither one is in the window. Five minutes.

One more thing. The door that only opens one way, and the two windows that share the same dates. Two minutes.

The tape

Close of October 1, 2026. Index and futures levels from CNBC US Markets, pulled at 4:15pm ET. Treasury yields are as of that moment, not the official close. Gold is the December 2026 contract and WTI the November 2026 contract, both unchanged from yesterday.

Crude did the work. WTI's November contract added 3.02% to $93.15, the biggest single-session move on this page in two weeks, and it is the same contract we printed yesterday, so the comparison is clean. That contract expires October 20, so the roll is coming and the base will change when it does. Both ends of the curve fell, the 10-year by 5.9 basis points and the 30-year by 3.4, which is the first time this week the long bond has gone the reader's way.

The story

Medicare open enrollment runs from October 15 to December 7. Fifty-four days. It is the most heavily advertised window in American personal finance, and for the next ten weeks this household will be told about it by every television in the house.

Here is what it does, taken from the "Joining a plan" page at medicare.gov, read yesterday:

Join, drop, or switch to another Medicare Advantage plan with or without drug coverage, or add or drop drug coverage. Switch from Original Medicare to a Medicare Advantage plan, or from a Medicare Advantage plan to Original Medicare. Join, drop, or switch to another Medicare drug plan if you are in Original Medicare.

Coverage starts January 1, and the plan has to receive the request by December 7.

That is the whole list. Read it again and notice what is not on it. Not one of those three items changes what she is charged for Part B.

The position

The $109,000 line has been the villain in this letter for three weeks. It has cost this household a surcharge, a seven basis point dead zone, two thirds of a municipal ladder, and an effective rate of 21.49% on a withdrawal she did not choose to take.

So the obvious question, two weeks before the famous window opens, is whether the window is the lever.

It is not, and the reason is a single sentence on the Social Security page titled Medicare Premiums: Rules For Higher-Income Beneficiaries:

"To determine your 2026 income-related monthly adjustment amounts, we use your most recent federal tax return the IRS provides to us. Generally, this information is from a tax return filed in 2025 for tax year 2024."

The premium she pays this year was decided by a return she filed last year, on a year that ended twenty-one months ago. The same page adds that sometimes the agency is still working from the year before that, which makes it a three-year lookback.

No plan she picks between October 15 and December 7 reaches backward into 2024. Nothing does, with one exception, and we will get to it.

The arithmetic

Step one. What Medicare costs her before any surcharge.

The standard Part B premium for 2026 is $202.90 a month, which both medicare.gov and ssa.gov state in those words. That is $2,434.80 a year. The Part B deductible is $283. Her floor, surcharge free, is $2,717.80.

Two other 2026 figures from the same page, because they are the ones the window genuinely touches: the Part A hospital deductible is $1,736 per benefit period, and the Part D out-of-pocket cap is $2,100.

Step two. What the window can move, stated precisely.

Social Security writes her Part D surcharge as "your plan premium + $14.50" at the first tier and "your plan premium + $37.50" at the second. Read that construction carefully. The add-on is fixed by a tax return. The base it sits on is the plan she chooses in October.

So the window is worth exactly the spread between the best and the worst drug plan she can buy, plus whatever the plan design does to her path to the $2,100 cap. That is a real number and it is worth an afternoon. It is not a cent of the surcharge.

Step three. Her premium schedule, laid out.

Because the lookback is two years, her next four premium years are already written by returns we can describe.

Premium year 2026 comes off tax year 2024. Both alive, taxable ladder, no required distribution yet. Joint income of $142,900 against a joint threshold of $218,000. Surcharge: zero.

Premium year 2027 comes off tax year 2025. Same picture, same zero, except that by then he is gone and she is the only person being billed.

Premium year 2028 comes off tax year 2026, the year he dies and the year of the conversion this letter sized on September 24. Joint income of $257,145.31. That is past $218,000, so the first tier applies: $81.20 on Part B and $14.50 on Part D, $95.70 a month, $1,148.40 for the year.

Premium year 2029 comes off tax year 2027, her first return as a single filer. With the required distribution taken as cash, her income is $154,283.02 against a single threshold of $109,000, two tiers up: $2,884.80. With the qualified charitable distribution instead, her income is exactly $109,000 and the surcharge is zero.

Each premium year is priced by a tax return filed two years earlier. Tiers, the lookback rule and the standard $202.90 premium are from ssa.gov, Medicare Premiums: Rules For Higher-Income Beneficiaries; the enrollment dates are from medicare.gov, Joining a plan. Both read October 1, 2026.

Step four. The size of those two numbers, in context.

$1,148.40 is 47.2% of a full year of standard Part B. She will pay it in 2028 because of something that happened in 2026.

$2,884.80 is 118.5% of a full year of standard Part B, and the structure is worth seeing. At her tier the Part B add-on is $202.90 a month, which is the standard premium to the penny. She pays exactly twice the Part B everyone else pays, and another $37.50 a month on top for Part D.

And it is the first surcharge she never stops paying, because it is caused by a required distribution that arrives every year for the rest of her life. The one on the 2028 bill is a single event. This one is a standing order.

Step five. The quiet advantage nobody mentions.

Look again at premium year 2028. Her income that year is measured at $257,145.31 under the joint lines, $218,000 and $274,000, because the return that produced it was a joint return. The bill arrives when she is single, when the lines are $109,000 and $137,000.

Price the same $257,145.31 under the single table and it falls above $205,000, which is the fifth tier: $446.30 on Part B and $83.30 on Part D, $529.60 a month, $6,355.20 a year.

Being measured under the joint table is worth $5,206.80 on that one return. And because only one person is enrolled by the time the bill comes, the charge is single rather than doubled, which is worth another $1,148.40.

That is the real argument for converting in the year of death, and it is larger than the bracket argument we have been making. The conversion is measured by a married couple's thresholds and billed to one widow.

The one form that reaches backward

There is exactly one instrument that undoes a lookback, and Social Security lists the conditions on the same page. If income has gone down because of a life-changing event, the agency will use the newer figure. Five events qualify. This is the first one, verbatim:

"You married or divorced, or your spouse died."

The other four are stopping work or cutting hours, losing income-producing property to a disaster, a scheduled termination or reorganization of an employer's pension plan, and an employer settlement following closure, bankruptcy or reorganization.

Her 2028 surcharge of $1,148.40 is computed on the return for the year he died. The qualifying event and the income year are the same year, which means the event sits inside the period the appeal covers. The appeal would ask Social Security to price 2028 on $109,000 rather than $257,145.31.

Two honest qualifications, because this letter has spent a week learning what happens when inputs go unchecked.

First, the reduction has to follow from the event. The part that clearly does is his Social Security benefit: the household's $74,000 becomes her $44,000, a documented $30,000 drop caused by the death. The part that does not is the $166,465.31 conversion, which was chosen. Social Security weighs the whole return, and what it does with one that contains a voluntary conversion is its call, not this letter's.

Second, the form fixes a lookback. It does not fix a threshold. Her $109,000 line is half of the $218,000 line she lived under while he was alive, and no form on earth moves that. The widow's penalty is permanent. The lookback is temporary. Only one of them is appealable, and knowing which is which is the whole skill.

What the four of them would say

The portfolio manager. Every position decision in this portfolio now casts a two-year shadow. The muni swap, the conversion, the required distribution: each one sets a premium you will not see billed for twenty-four months. That is an unusually long feedback loop, and long feedback loops are where disciplined people get sloppy, because nothing punishes them at the time. Write the 2028 consequence on the 2026 decision sheet or you will not remember it was there.

The CPA. Read Social Security's own definition once more: modified adjusted gross income is total adjusted gross income plus tax-exempt interest income. The agency says it in one sentence on a public page. A municipal ladder is invisible to the tax table and completely visible to Medicare. That is the single most expensive thing a retiree can misunderstand, and it is the reason a $1.6 million ladder had to be resized three separate times this month.

The financial planner. The window with the marketing budget behind it is the window that matters least to this household. The window that actually prices her premium is the tax year, it has no name, nobody advertises it, and it closes on December 31. Notice the collision: the famous one shuts December 7, and the one that counts stays open twenty-four more days. Most people finish their Medicare decisions three weeks before the decision that mattered was even due.

The estate attorney. The first qualifying event on Social Security's list is the death of a spouse. That ordering is not an accident. Whoever wrote the rule understood that a two-year lookback systematically overcharges widows, because it bills a one-person household on a two-person return. The remedy exists. It is one form. Almost nobody files it, because the bill arrives twenty-four months after the funeral and by then nobody connects the two.

One more thing

The October window looks symmetric. Medicare.gov says she may switch from Original Medicare to a Medicare Advantage plan, or from a Medicare Advantage plan back to Original Medicare. Two directions, one window, no conditions.

The Medicare side of that is true. The insurance side is not.

From the Medigap page at medicare.gov, read yesterday: the Medigap open enrollment period lasts six months, starts the first month she has Part B at 65 or older, and during it no insurer may refuse her a policy or charge her more for a pre-existing condition. Then the sentence that matters: it is a one-time enrollment period, and it does not repeat every year. Outside it, an insurer is allowed to apply medical underwriting and may deny her a policy altogether.

So the trip out of Original Medicare is free and the trip back is only free on the government's half. She can always return to Original Medicare in October. Whether she can buy the supplement that makes Original Medicare affordable is a different company's decision, made on her health at 73 rather than at 65.

At 73 that is the whole question, and no page frames it that way, because the two halves are run by two different organizations and only one of them has a window.

One more date, because it catches people. Two completely different enrollment periods run from January 1 to March 31. The Medicare Advantage open enrollment period, which is only for people already in an Advantage plan and lets them switch plans or return to Original Medicare. And the general enrollment period, which is for people who did not sign up when they were first eligible. Same dates, different people, different powers, and both are frequently called "the January window" by someone trying to sell something.

Monday

Thursday's letter ended with the estate attorney pointing at the damage. Every conversion this month was sized against a $1,200,000 account that turns out to have a mandatory $45,283.02 withdrawal coming out of it first, and required distribution dollars can never go to a Roth.

So the sizing is wrong, in a knowable direction, by a knowable amount.

Monday we re-run all of it from the required distribution up, and today gives us one more input to carry in: the conversion year is measured under joint lines and billed to one person. That makes the year of death worth more than we said, not less.

Sources

Keep going

James Ustby, CFP®

James Ustby, CFP®, APMA®

Wealth Advisor, LPL Financial. Durham and Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

James Ustby is a CFP® professional and Accredited Portfolio Management Advisor who works with families, retirees, and business owners in the Triangle on retirement income, tax-aware withdrawals, and the decisions that decide whether the money lasts. He writes one question at a time, shows the math, and links the government source for every figure. He is currently working toward the Enrolled Agent credential.

Book a free 30-minute second opinion

How I am paid: through LPL Financial, by planning fees, advisory fees, and commissions on insurance products, all disclosed in writing before any engagement. Nothing on this page is a recommendation for you.

Get the next article by email. Or take the free Retirement Reality Report: 14 questions, a written diagnosis.

One email every morning: one money question, the math shown, the government page it came from. Free. Unsubscribe with one click.

Securities and advisory services are offered through LPL Financial (LPL), a registered investment advisor and broker-dealer (member FINRA/SIPC). Insurance products are offered through LPL or its licensed affiliates. Fidelity Bank and Fidelity Bank Wealth Management are not registered as a broker-dealer or investment advisor. Registered representatives of LPL offer products and services using Fidelity Bank Wealth Management, and may also be employees of Fidelity Bank. These products and services are being offered through LPL or its affiliates, which are separate entities from, and not affiliates of, Fidelity Bank or Fidelity Bank Wealth Management.

  • Not Insured by FDIC or Any Other Government Agency
  • Not Bank Guaranteed
  • Not Bank Deposits or Obligations
  • May Lose Value

The LPL Financial registered representative associated with this site may discuss and transact securities business only with residents of the states in which they are properly registered or licensed. No offer may be made or accepted from any resident of any other state.

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. Neither LPL Financial nor its representatives provide legal or tax advice; please consult your attorney or tax advisor regarding your specific situation. No strategy assures success or protects against loss. Examples are hypothetical and for illustration only.

Book a free call